🔗 Share this article

During last year's presidential campaign, the former president courted voters with pledges to lower costs immediately upon taking office. However, after his inauguration, he seemed to pay precious little attention to affordability issues. All that changed following inflation-weary citizens expressed dissatisfaction at the polls. Shortly thereafter, his team initiated a slapdash effort to address affordability. Regrettably, the drive has proven a hot mess—filled with absurdity, inconsistencies, magical thinking, scapegoating, and misleading statements.

Out-of-Touch Claims and Grocery Store Reality

Merely 48 hours after the election, Trump began his cost-reduction push with a poorly received statement: “Food prices are way down. Everything is way down… So I don’t want to hear about the cost of living.” These words from billionaire Trump—often mingles with other ultra-rich individuals—demonstrated utter contempt for millions of Americans facing difficulties when visiting supermarkets. In effect, he ignored their struggles as unimportant, suggesting they had it wrong about price levels.

His assertion about declining prices was absurdly obtuse and inaccurate. How could every price be decreasing when the taxes he imposed were pushing up prices? Recent data indicate the cost of bananas increased nearly 7% over the past year, the price of beef went up almost 15%, and coffee prices surged by nearly 19%—in part because of punitive tariffs on Brazil’s coffee and beef. Between January and September, costs increased in the majority of food categories tracked by the government’s price index, such as meats, poultry, and fish (rising over 4%), non-alcoholic beverages (increasing nearly 3%), and produce (up 1.3%).

Inconsistencies and Falsehoods in Financial Statements

In spite of the evidence, the president continues to push his big lie about affordability. After the vote, he has stated there is “virtually no inflation,” declared “costs have fallen significantly,” and asserted “living is cheaper under Trump than it was under his predecessor.” These statements ignore the reality that prices overall have clearly increased after the previous administration. At present, price growth is running at a 3 percent per year, which is 50% higher than the Federal Reserve’s 2% goal. In another falsehood, Trump claimed that fuel costs had fallen to nearly $2 a gallon, even though official data show they are $3.19.

Faced with reality and declining opinion polls, advisers apparently cautioned that his “prices are down” message portrayed him as dangerously out of touch from typical Americans. Many voters are frustrated about rising costs after promises of reductions. In response, aides proposed a simple solution: reduce some of Trump’s beloved tariffs. The logical move clashed with Trump’s absurd assertion that additional taxes would not increase costs for US consumers.

Suggested Fixes and Their Potential Effects

As some tariffs reduced on several food items, Trump will likely announce that he has lowered costs once these products start declining in price. This would be like an arsonist boasting for extinguishing a blaze that he ignited. On another occasion, while speaking fast-food leaders, he stated that “we are in the peak period of America” and told the audience that “prices are coming down and all of that stuff.” Such statements come naturally for a wealthy individual to make, but seem insincere to countless households who are struggling—particularly when many risk cuts to nutrition assistance or rising insurance costs.

Per a recent poll from October, 74% of Americans think the state of the economy are fair or poor, while just a quarter rate them good or excellent. A separate survey found that a majority of citizens say the administration’s actions have “made the economy worse” in the country.

Economic Reality and Suggested Measures

The treasury secretary, the president’s top economic official, recently disputed claims of a prosperous era. He stated that instead of thriving, some parts of the US economy “are in recession.” The manufacturing sector—a priority for the administration—appears to have contracted for multiple consecutive months and lost around tens of thousands of positions this year. Citing this weakness, the secretary urged the central bank to reduce borrowing costs—an action that could help affordability.

Reacting to public dismay about affordability, the president suggested a cash handout of “a payout of at least $2,000 a person” excluding “the wealthy.” To numerous struggling Americans, this sounds like manna from heaven, but it is unlikely that lawmakers—concerned about large shortfalls—will approve the proposal. The scheme would likely increase federal spending, push up borrowing costs, and possibly drive prices higher by injecting cash into consumers’ pockets.

Another supposed fix for affordability centered on creating half-century home loans, with the notion that they could lower housing costs. But, the truth is that 50-year mortgages would do little to lower monthly payments—often reducing them by just $100 or $200 per month. The drawback is that these loans could more than double the overall cost borrowers pay and slow building home value.

Blaming the Previous Administration and Economic Prospects

As part of their cost-cutting effort, the administration have again pointed fingers at Biden for financial challenges, including rising prices. Officials claimed they “inherited a disaster from Joe Biden” and were “addressing the prior administration’s price hikes.” This is unfounded and inaccurate allegations. In reality, Biden left a robust economic situation, with low price growth, economic growth strong, and minimal joblessness. But, Trump’s policies—particularly import taxes—have created an difficult situation, driving costs higher and slowing GDP growth.

According to an economist, lead analyst at a research firm, numerous regions are experiencing economic decline, with their economies damaged by the administration’s trade policies. Zandi worries that if key regions like major economies tumble into recession, the US could face a broad economic slump. In downturns, people typically have reduced funds to spend, and inflation usually declines. Unfortunately, given the highly-touted cost initiative likely to do little to control costs, his primary method for improving living standards might prove to be triggering an economic contraction—a scenario that struggling Americans cannot handle.