🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat say that a lack of decision over how to address the issue is creating avoidable anguish concerning the final resting places of their loved ones.

A Looming Threat to Historic Graveyards

Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being swallowed by the sea in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the issue sets out a series of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure locations. Authorities say it is for the community to decide how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. They wanted this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Projections suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident remembered a school trip to the nearby village of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the water, including its church and graveyard.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to sea. That is not the case. People will take bones as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of treasures. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that happened at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Along the coast is situated the grave of a ex-soldier killed while serving abroad. His mother said she lost sleep after discovering her son’s grave might one day be moved.

“It truly trouble me to think this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”

She believes, new interments should cease but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Searching for Solutions and Clarity

An absence of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and worried.

Some are calling for more coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow funerals to proceed for now. Others contend the time for moving graves is drawing near.

“It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A local official said the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is up to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with residents.”

It was also stated there was ample time to consider all the options. “We are talking many years before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires productive local conversations to discover the appropriate answers for each village.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “profound sadness for the area,” but faith leaders also spoke of a belief in resurrection, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal disappearance of hallowed earth.